Digital Realty's new survey of 2,131 IT decision-makers found the share naming a lack of specialized infrastructure as their primary AI constraint has more than quadrupled in two years. Seagate's numbers show why the problem stayed hidden for so long.
Key Takeaways
Two years ago, almost nobody blamed the data center. When Digital Realty's 2026 Global Data Insights Survey asked 2,131 IT decision-makers across 19 countries what was holding their AI initiatives back, 40% named a lack of specialized infrastructure as the primary constraint. In 2024 the same answer came from 9%. That shift happened in the same two years that most organizations spent treating AI as a software and talent problem.
The shift makes sense once you look at what respondents are now trying to do. Seventy-nine percent expect to deploy AI initiatives in 2026, and 98% expect to be running real-time AI applications within 12 months. Real-time inference does not tolerate data sitting in the wrong place, which is why 92% of respondents now tie data location decisions directly to their AI plans, up from 73% two years earlier. Eighty-eight percent have adopted a distributed data strategy, 86% are pursuing sovereign AI initiatives, and more than half host AI workloads in private cloud environments.
That is a very different estate from the one most AI pilots were built on. A proof of concept can run on a single cloud region with a copied dataset. A production system serving real-time decisions across several regions needs the data, the compute, and the network path between them to sit where regulation, latency, and cost all allow. Digital Realty's Chief Revenue Officer, Colin McLean, summed it up: "Infrastructure beneath AI is now the gatekeeper between promise and payoff." Respondents are not pulling back either. They expect AI spending to rise 32% over the next year, and only 3% report no measurable return from AI so far. The money is there. The floor it has to run on is not.
If infrastructure is the problem, why did it take until 2026 to show up in the surveys? Seagate's Data Infrastructure Readiness Report 2026, fielded by Recon Analytics with 2,712 enterprise technology decision-makers across seven countries in May and June, offers an answer. Eighty-three percent of respondents say they are fully or mostly prepared for AI's demands. Only 38% say they are fully prepared for its long-term data demands. The gap between "mostly" and "fully" is where the infrastructure surprise has been hiding.
The demand side of that equation is not in doubt. Ninety-nine percent expect AI to increase their storage requirements over the next three years, 70% expect those requirements to grow by at least 26%, and 32% expect growth of more than 50%. Forty-three percent already identify storage infrastructure as a key constraint, and 53% cite data quality and readiness as their leading deployment challenge. Sustainability is complicating the build-out as well: 77% have delayed or restructured an expansion because of sustainability concerns, and only 39% describe their storage operations as very sustainable today. Organizations that were "mostly" ready for a pilot are discovering what "mostly" costs at production scale.
The hardest part of that data is the part that never lived in a database. A Nasuni survey of 1,000 senior IT and procurement decision-makers found 94% struggle to manage unstructured data, the documents, design files, and media that carry most of an enterprise's institutional knowledge. Only 16% treat managing it as a strategic IT priority. Seventy-nine percent report inconsistent file access across locations, 90% cite data security, integration, and trust as barriers to scaling AI, and only 43% of AI initiatives meet their original objectives. Nearly every firm is piloting AI agents, but just 18% have deployed them at scale.
Cloudera's Data Readiness Index, a survey of 1,270 IT leaders at companies with more than 1,000 employees, shows the same confidence pattern Seagate found. Eighty-five percent say they have a clear data strategy and 84% feel confident in their data's accuracy and completeness, yet only 18% say their data is fully governed and nearly four in five admit their AI initiatives are constrained by limited data access across environments. "AI is only as effective as the data that fuels it," said Sergio Gago, Cloudera's Chief Technology Officer. A distributed data strategy that 88% of enterprises have adopted is only an advantage if the data in every one of those locations can actually be reached, governed, and secured.
Nine percent to 40% in two years is not a trend line that flattens on its own. The organizations that looked ready for AI in 2024 were mostly being asked to run pilots, and pilots hide infrastructure problems well. Production does not. The enterprises that close this gap in the next twelve months will be the ones that stop asking whether their models are good enough and start asking whether the floor underneath them can carry the weight.
Whitepaper
Nasuni found 94% of enterprises struggle with unstructured data and only 16% prioritize it. This whitepaper covers how to put AI to work on the contracts and documents most AI plans leave behind in the file share.
Download
Guide
When 86% of enterprises pursue sovereign AI and most host workloads in private cloud, training data and inference pipelines end up in more places than ever. This guide covers the controls each of those locations needs.
Download
Whitepaper
A distributed data strategy, now adopted by 88% of Digital Realty's respondents, only works if policy holds in every environment the data lands in. This whitepaper covers keeping that policy consistent across clouds.
Download
Analysis of 300 enterprise workloads finds the true cost gap is far narrower than most TCO models suggest.
SD-WAN has crossed the mainstream threshold, and teams that delayed migration now face a compounding penalty.
Edge deployments have moved from pilot to production across manufacturing, retail and healthcare.